How To Shortenthe Curtain

Contents

INHALTSVERZEICHN IS

Welcome to
challenge social assistance
*

" exalted over all things spiritual and intellectual,

on philosophy and theology

is the willingness

from human to human, the task

brother to be. " Albert Schweitzer

What Are Breast Buds Images

fundamental rights - legal certainty - the abuse of rights

fundamental rights - legal certainty - the abuse of rights

This is a previous record - the latest entries: Contents

Friday 26 February 2010, arbitrariness 71st days were

For the office of the politicians used to be a rule of thumb. A public official before a citizen crossed the street, should resign. There are huge differences in the self-assessment. The citizens believe in the encounter with the devil, the politicians think is for God.
As a counterpart to see politicians and officials in many cases the complainant Incarnate, in the "hell" has to stay to the gods in the clouds, to be ruled in peace.

In the legal foundations for social welfare, the right of appeal and related rights are guaranteed and secured. Who takes appeal, puts the wrath of the Gods "from. He becomes a pawn in a game is played in full at the man, only for himself bitter reality. He meets lack of objectivity, rejection, Indifference, a tone that is very often dominated by slander, misinformation, unsubstantiated allegations and arbitrariness.

a smooth completion of procedures required for a certain time, but they take too long. A complaints procedure now takes about six months. A trial before the State Council of the filing of the complaint until the decision to take up to 6 months and before the District Court only 3 months.

confirm the file that is stalled at the Board of Instruction, the cantonal department of the municipality with several months of "information gaps" and often the answer to the information required to be between the community and SMZ and forth. A one-time response time, as is possible in the courts could help. The procedural provisions in the administration of justice would leave too much leeway in time, in the case and the discretion, they should focus on the Code of Civil Procedure to be adjusted. Despite the long duration, the assistance to the applicant immediately, without time barriers should be possible.

The "fifth court," the budget, must decide in principle, not in processes such assistance, the procedures are free of charge. The rights guaranteed by the recipients are diminished by the fact that the procedures for a lawyer are very time consuming and the lawyer participation, for the needy is virtually impossible.

Why need no real right to protection and assistance so that they are protected against arbitrary action and their rights are represented? On 7 March 2010, we decide at the ballot box, whether animals are "better legal protection and legal assistance, an animal lawyer"?

being responsible municipal law of the council, he may entrust the organization and execution of a SMZ. The SMZ have their basis in the Health Act. It is life of its own incompetent and "errors" of the SMZ. This lack of controlled, tight specifications, and a helpful and relevant jurisdictional regime.

The trained social workers of the SMZ, professionals ready to support decisions before as part of a decision. The responsibility for the total available to grant, denial, reduction, adjustment, opening the applicant the responsibility of the council based on a council decision.

As the link between the SMZ and the municipal council there in the community, staffed by lay people without specification, with the lack of factual knowledge, gaps, and often other features, commission on social affairs. Vulnerability to arbitrary harassment and deliberate delays, with or without the questionable legal advice, are wrong sites.

bumbling amateurs orders do not meet the required policy in SKOS A.4 professionalism, this may be required by the disposal until the consummation. One, not only with findings and allegations, but as the law requires, mellow, legally and factually based, reduced complaints.

The four main methods have proved to be barriers. Subject were 5 orders, two were protected, repealed three or to the community for reassessment rejected. The judgments of A1 and A1 07 10 08 159 strengthened the claim and were the basis for controlled support for longer time. The verdict of A1 07 110 recognized legally insufficient to considerable clarification of the circumstances and the inadequacy of the order. The State Council raised the already illegal, as sanctions decreed reductions in the reduction of the minimum subsistence on.

The ruling in the "arbitrariness" under 1 A1 09 210 Currently in the blog on 11 02. published 10, emerges as a "moose test", the moose has snogged the social welfare authorities anything.

To supplement the overview of the running times of each procedure. The legal and judicial legal arrest, complaint, response, and instruction periods are included as non-recently-in periods during the specified dates.

available: 07 08. 06, method: A1 07 10, appeal to the State Council: 31 08. 06, State Council decision 29 11. 06, appeal to the District Court: 18 11. 07, District Court Case: 10 05. 07.

available: 29 01. 07, method: 07 110 A1, complaint to the State Council: 23 02. 07, State Council decision 30 05. 07, appeal to the District Court: 02 07. 07, Judgement District Served: 26 10. 07.

available: 12 12. 07, method: 08 159 A1, complaint to the State Council: 08 01. 08, State Council decision on 25 06. 08, appeal to the District Court: 05 09. 08, District Court Case: 05 12. 08.

available: 03.02./13.03.09, procedures: 09 210 A1, appeal to the State Council: 23 04. 09, State Council Decision: 14. 10. 09, appeal to the District Court: 15 11. 09, District Court Case: 04 02. 10.

supplementary service request on 14 04. 06

available: 14 07. 06, method: S1 08 73, objection to AHV / IV / EL - VS: 07 08. 06. Decision AHV / IV / EL: 29 11. 06, appeal to the edge. Insurance Court: 05 01. 07, cantonal Insurance Court Judgement: 25 06. 07.

late production of several documents

available New: 14 11. 07, method: S1 08 73, objection to AHV / IV / EL - VS: 12 12. 08, decision AHV / IV / EL: 08 02. 08, complained to square. Insurance Court: 07 03. 08, cantonal Insurance Court Judgement: 26 08. 09.

are not listed on the collection process for the attachment of unpaid social security contributions.

abuse of rights

In legal disputes in administrative and judicial procedures to meet the apparent "magic word" abuse of rights. It is often thrown into the balance, it seems that when an instance of their cause Not sure, or the abuse of opponents and thus dishonest actions should be subject.

The "magic" between falsehood and claim that most unbewiesenem in connection open in the social welfare as an accusation and insinuation, often at the mercy door 'and the target.

Not every kind, a little shock behavior is quite unfair, but only a crass shock behavior. By a complaining party generally lack the above conditions.

The complainant takes to right to appeal a statutory right, his desire for a formal review of military goods, which result for example of a decision. A useless exercise of rights, for example, out of revenge or harassment is itself therefore does not exist.

On behalf of the complainant is usually also no small interest, but caused by the misconduct of public authorities or other party, the complainant damages, which are demonstrable and verifiable.

The term abuse of rights should in no laws, never as a benchmark for one reason or decision or other property be included. In social assistance should be the guiding themes for borrowers and donors, in case of refusal, a clear evidence and a reasoned decision on the substance. This condition should be mandatory, especially when it comes to the legality of welfare dependence.

emergency, person and time, make the laws strictly and wide.

What Other 2 Virus' Are Going Around

Targeted degradation of "uncooperative"

Targeted degradation of "uncooperative"

This is a previous record - currently available: Contents

The appeal against the order of 12 12. 07 was rejected. The order has grown in legal force.

After making entry into force of the District Police to the designation, provided that the municipality according to the SKOS obligation and the Judgement of 05 12. 08, before any reasonable apartment provides.

einfädelnde The office of Zermatt's leadership passed from the line of fire. The emerging social policy in the cantonal parliament, the men for the rough, take over the unpleasant work of expulsion, and funds the municipality from the background to the landlord to the designation. The reported sitting on the street and paid for this seat sponsored "The Replacements" Fr 2.600.00.

The District Court confirmed the ruling of the district judge. confirmed the municipality violated the laws and social legislation of the cantonal court that the municipality and Landlord behaved correctly including the higher rent. Social policy is ticking in some places a bit different.

The municipality makes a false statement in the room, as the registration of a mortgage through the back door, federal law and therefore was not possible, is simply illegal under social assistance. By the way, the process is to cost up to Fr 35.000.00. A clarification of a questionable accounting, you can also prevent and bekänpfen. There is nothing easier than that to connect and take advantage of their plight, which lie on the ground.

The Valais Social Assistance Act has holes not only in mortgages, who judges what and who is responsible for what, it bring itself apart with the judges opinions. Further, not bad? When two quarrel, the third laughs, far from it. Not in the Valais. After the district judge held that it had no jurisdiction, the municipality brought action for annulment, the District Court granted the community of law. Who pays the bill? See below, not the municipality, not the state, but the "welfare recipients". Part cost of 09 100 C1 of competence of the judge: 2.500.00 Fri.

belongs, according to statistics in the Valais IV pensions, the EL performance and the welfare of the "deeper" cantons. As it were much of the government benches, on the occasion of the last true Grand Council session, there are three lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.

morality and politics? No problem: conscience is to come from knowledge, the smaller the knowledge of all the major "chunks" to digest the conscience. Marked corruption and favoritism in the form of felt, in Zermatt? Who celebrates felt with the greatest self-evident Felt will no longer true in Zermatt know ... yes all

There are three truths, one that I know, one you know and we know not both, can or should. There are abuses and who disturbs certain circles is caught in a war of extermination. As it says in the Valais? "Düü müescht in Getti ha", in written language and in Italy the godfather means and has nothing to do with baptism and confirmation.

NB. By 7 December 2009 = CHF 5.100.00 - which only takes almost 4 monthly individual state pensions ...

Friday 15 January 2010, 29th caprice Days

The lawyer is not only an independent professional man, he is also "an independent court or tribunal". His professional practice subject to state approval and oversight and is largely regulated by law.

is Article 1 of the Swiss ethics:

lawyers practice their profession in accordance with the law carefully and conscientiously. They fail anything that their trust in question.

Anyone who is on exactly one day need the services of a lawyer benefits from these principles and a proper use. As a good lawyer is, the one who prevented the conflict and not fueling.

The pleadings of the municipality contain an aggressive, offensive, unsubstantiated allegations and information, and verifiable, systematic false allegations. Some, not something squeamish tones belong to the business, sound and form but also ultimately make the music. Counterfeit notes are the quotes from the 09th complaint response 03.07 and the extract from the action memorandum dated 13 05. 09, as below in the published letter of 10 11. 09, are included in the municipal president.

For about a month (12th 12th 09), meet our blog visitors with the statement: (Office) = vandal vandalism deliberate damage or destruction is illegal alien mental or physical goods for its own sake.

On 10 12. 09, we informed the law firm of the municipality, Rieder & Pfammatter and employees to Matthew Philip Bregy Account of more than CHF 5'100 .00 (CHF 2,600 and CHF 2,500 .00 .00) payment period to 07 12. 09, (blog heading "Targeted degradation of" uncooperative ") with:

" At your financial worries and the community of residence, I can tell you that your invoice is paid. It should incidentally referred to the fact that the Municipality of Zermatt at 30 11. 09, the transfer of lawfully awarded (Case of 05 12th District Court 08), outstanding support contributions of CHF 9.828.00, "password" has. "

On 11 12. 09 was, according to the present postal receipt referred Fri 5'100 .00, the full invoice amount. This did not prevent the lawyers for some of this demand, Br 2,500 .00 with interest from 11th 12. 09, apparently in response to the published letter of 10 12. 09, to initiate the operation. The order is dated 28 12. 09, it would be left after payment enough time to pull back the debt collection request.

This example speaks for itself and adds to what is currently ongoing "war of extermination" Blog listed in the derailment. (Setting the partial support, expulsion, false target to the presence of a replacement dwelling, storage of our property, the prevention of control and removal of clothes, personal belongings, documents and public accusation of unlawful cover).

The reason of the compression tests, only the enforcement of a collection method with forced use of the land and preventing the disclosure of wrongdoing by the social welfare authorities at all levels and a controlled settlement, which has proven to curiosities and questions unanswered, are suspected.

Zermatt is in the tourism formula I on the road, tourism service providers, cable cars, private service providers, hotels and catering formula I to want to ride in the parish hall with some souped-up scooter in Formula I, as a Legal and legal counsel is not enough. The important "pit work" in the Community House, must also be efficient formula I.

Maximum Blood Sugar Level Diabetes

family support and social assistance

family support and social assistance
This is a previous record - the latest entries: Contents

Monday 18 January 2010, arbitrariness 32nd Days

has recently spoken out in the Federal Court on issues of family support and social assistance. It moves into his decision to support relatives in the ascending and descending lines narrow limits.

The right of the cantons is limited to the establishment of procedural and jurisdictional rules. Requirements and scope of Are using federal law and can not be determined by the cantons. The relevant principles enshrined in the Civil Code. set

A family support through social assistance available to the authorities is illegal. Ultimately, only the judge set a family support post.

It is not only problematic, but wrongful where local social welfare agencies, with more or less of pressure, without being guided by applicable law, in all directions go to hunt for relatives support.

tax records of wealth and income brought in by relatives and close potential subject matter, the "peddling" of.

The Swiss Conference for Social Assistance (SKOS) has adjusted the amounts now the federal court judgments and records in its directive F.4 following principles:

Guys Camping Boxer Shorts

Construction work + early breakfast

Well, what do you do when absolutely arrives early time of the large dredging and digging ne pit. And then also be used even at night when coming home the anti-wave protection walls?

Na mu s time simply goes to work and make delicious breakfast:

baguette with mozzarella, tomatoes, Serrano ham, Gouda cheese, cucumbers and onions under it yet. Can the excavators often come early, huh? (For if one comes only at 11 is the baguette all :-()

Testicles Sore, Hurts To Bend

subsistence

livelihoods

This is a previous record - the latest entries: Contents

Friday 19 February 2010, arbitrariness 64.Tag

The existence of safety is in the Federal Constitution (Article 12) and is implemented by the individual subsistence. From the different legal bases and tasks of social assistance, supplementary benefits and the collection and bankruptcy procedures, there are different livelihoods.

The differences in the identification operations, the fundamentals of individual Notbedarfs, calculations and amounts. Between the poverty of welfare and the poverty of the supplement, can not add individual financial assets (livelihood) will be replaced.

The District Court in its Judgement of 10 05. A1 07 10 07 in these issues in detail and in principle deals. In the observations on the various responsibilities were (social insurance (EL) federal, cantonal social assistance, SchKG Federation) above. For a uniform minimum subsistence Nationwide, there are no single solution and no framework legislation.

The two inserted tables present the components and the different calculations between benefits and social assistance, and the resulting different sorts of services.

Essential and basic Goods and services should, with a minimum financial income (Notbedarf), are made possible and guaranteed. The social subsistence level, should allow a modest standard of living, in addition to vital basic needs, a participation in social and cultural life.

The SKOS guidelines correspond to the meaning of the Swiss Conference of Social Assistance Directors, established by experts principles. The basis for calculating the additional entitlement to AVS and IV are defined in the policy making process of the commissions.

The above two are joined by the running non-subsistence level, it meets the requirements of the Bankruptcy Law and the principles of the Conference of debt collection and bankruptcy officials.

The A1 07 10 prevented the intention in setting social assistance connect the lower approach to living according to SKOS, with the lower rental housing from the calculation model of the supplement.

The council took place with the order of 29 01. 07, next to Andren Errors, the absolute value of the adjustment to the EL rent. The injunction was in A1 07 110 repealed the decisive points and turned back at the municipality. This illegal trick the municipality or the SMZ Nikolaital their obligation would be reduced to 550.00 months Fr.

led the misconduct of the municipality in addition, by ignoring the suspensive effect of this complaint and the illegal withholding of the payments of subsistence for the resolution of our existing direct lease (monthly rent Fri 1'800 .00) with the landlord. (See blog third residential ratio)

For the same apartment closed the municipality for CHF 2'400 .00 (600.00 plus Fr), immediately before the decision directly to the A1 07 110 Owners sign a contract. They "set" itself and us, on 18 12. 09, somewhat unusually, more reserved, from this house to the street.

assets

From the foregoing representations are the differences of the two Existenzminima, you can come in the legal documents and guidelines further observations that are missing here.

The calculations have to supplement variations in the light of the assets on to welfare. This is due to the jurisdiction of the federal government (social security) and the cantons (social assistance).

The District Court ruling, the public service department from 04 02. 10, on 11 02. 10 here to date, published in the blog was referring to the method S1 08 73 and the verdict of 26 08. 09 of the social security department of the District Court. In its considerations, it is expressed, the fixing and the inclusion of the market value in the determination of supplementary benefits. Particular to cantonal regulations concerning the supplementary benefits to the AHV / IV of 09 12. 1998 Article 8, paragraph 2:

"2 The fair value generally corresponds to the the previous two years the sale of properties in the same local group achieved average price. Should the tax be equal to the fair market value, this is for the supplement calculation prevail. If the tax obviously

too low or too high, is made by the fund in cooperation with the local Commission for the land estimations a new estimate. "

The second and third set these regulations leave too much room and prevent some EL orientation. In theory, already a slightly higher Verkehrsschatzung argues against the alignment of a supplement. Whether and how high and whether the discretion of the competent authority is available to regulated, remains open here. The add-back of 1 / 15 of market value as revenue unavailable to the available income (eg pensions), brought the cows, goats and sheep in the hay, the owners but not a "bread".

The standard deduction in determining the EL assets is still .00 CHF 40,000, the question is right: Why is not this today's CHF 60'000 .00 adjusted the tax assessments?

the Valais social politicians queue would be good if they pay more attention to this fact and would have placed in the "gray panthers" and their "exploitation" a little more interest. Higher hurdles for EL mean a different kind of "retirement Klaus.

observing and should clear the legislature with the first sentence of the ELR article 8, paragraph 2, it can from the regulation because lapsed be removed, because the social security department of the District Court states:

The extracts from the judgments that define the various authorities on the one hand the relevant subsistence level, there are also other, different rights for the exercise of these remedies.

The judges in the social welfare leads (VVRG) via appeal to the Privy Council, related to the legal department of the District Court, the Federal Court in Lausanne.

The appeal to the Social Security begins adopted, with an objection procedure that authority to the site (Cantonal AHV / IV / EL agency ") has and passes through the social security department of the District Court to Federal Insurance Court in Lucerne.

running non-running differences over the district courts as the lower and the District Court as a supervisory body to the top Federal Court in Lausanne.

"Gsottes, Härpfel Chabus and" you can not offer the same plate, but they still differ in growth, harvest and taste. "

Broken Vessels On Baby's Cheeks

securing the welfare

This is a previous record - recent entries: Contents

fuse entry in the Land

Friday, February 5, 2010, arbitrariness 50.Tag

country is pledge - pledge does land - mortgage money is
Where, how, who?

The "involuntary" voluntary "mortgage

The registration of a legal mortgage by GES Article 22, which is central to those who wait, is federal law. The registration of a state based on agreement (ie, contractual) basis lien to secure the restitution claim (with notification by the landlord) is permitted. GES, and SKOS know ARGES However, no guarantee in advance how it is practiced in the Valais.

prerequisite for this is clearly the free will and free legal capacity of the deposit plate, which is also in the normal sense of justice of the citizen. The "Lex Darioli" violated its basic principle: "If the social assistance applicant denied the organization of such mortgages (- ...) thus is not entitled to social assistance," arbitrary constitution and existing legislation. Even for a refusal of this kind, the competent social welfare authority the council under applicable law to issue an appealable decree. Whoever is in distress needed urgently missing part of the basic security of life, which he is entitled.

The land registry in business and a land registry in the social welfare can not be assimilated into the matter and already over time.

In social assistance, the claim is, in many cases, temporary or on a clear time period. The legitimate need of is extradited, he is entitled to an injunction, but he can not wait six to eight months to appeal ruling. He needs immediate help and no forced "involuntary" voluntary "agreement.

The combination between today's existing elements in the bestgehenden legislation to the particular situation of land ownership in the Valais into account and the already detailed, this SKOS guidelines is likely to give direction.

The mortgage assurance should be at a later sale due or when entering the mode of inheritance. It needs clear guidelines.

It would be desirable that the State Council until there is a different system, would instruct the DSW, the municipalities and the SMZ, such improper "involuntary, voluntary" mortgage registrations to be omitted. The obligation to repay is mentioned on the respective orders and the train, GES, and the SKOS ARGES directives.

basis to ensure reimbursement

The Civil Code sets the parent to the legal framework governing the registration of a basic deposit to secure the refund and to enable it. A new welfare law has to take account of this perspective. The basis of social assistance is superficially the lack of income for livelihood and could not be guaranteed.

The implementation of the guarantee and refund, the fundamental rights of the needy and ensure compliance, and in the processes of decent, very safe procedure handle. Outsourcing and partial privatization of social security may not develop strong life of its own and should be the "growth" controlled "inflation" can be prevented.

with a publicly notarised, in the land registry office eigetragenen Treaty, is safe from all the services provided in terms of a debt with a mortgage. The civil law commerce natural process, can not and should not be transferred directly to one on the socio-legal obligation.

case of social assistance are taken into account in the settlement and the road to registration, the particular circumstances. This is not a lender and borrower. The "quasi Rating" "Birds do or spoil," as the "Lex Darioli" includes such is the wrong way.

Social assistance takes the place where no other option, the absolute minimum subsistence guaranteed by the Constitution is safe. Hence there are restrictions in terms of income for livelihood, resulting from the circumstances of the occurrence of need result. have reasons of economic or health reasons. The benefits office should not create through its new security policy for recipients and block emergency reserves, which can relieve the public sector in the future and may compensate, to advance or destroy. Each case must be examined in detail.

The mortgage is mortgage and exploitation, it allows the creditor to recovery of the property to the amount of principal. The capital of the community and the purpose of economic assistance (social assistance) are different from a pure banking business. This has an impact on the assertion of patent rights.

The Municipal Act assigns the responsibility of social services available in the local council. More legal basis in addition to the cantonal GES, ARGES and the Swiss oriented SKOS guidelines are not, the discretion of social services and the gaps in the legislation are now too big.

The following questions are allowed:

 Has the DSW for the "Lex Darioli" - preset standard agreements in form and content, or may in the sense of "JEKAMI" (anyone can join) tinker each community or each SMZ, even an agreement together?

 For the benefit of whom is the registration? Who has the refusal, without prior issue not even entry help?  (available only authority is the local council)

A mortgage is registered, It is argued that is taken out a loan? Who, when, why and how on the land or real estate loans are taken out, or cause its recovery?

 Where does the money, they are bound to end? There are guidelines and guardrails for a possible mortgaging and cash flow? How to deal with the possible, illegal payments and agreed deletion of unused "credits" is?

 Can the county, the SMZ with the interest-free economic support and their Grundpfandkapitalien working interest in other profitable areas of the administration of social assistance?

 If given the right to equality for the recipients within the canton, and between different communities? Is there a specific check and does it function?

The blog readers were given an insight in recent weeks with the pressure we were facing a targeted manner. Objective: the imposition of an "involuntary" voluntary " Mortgages, covering up the misconduct, pure harassment and attempting to influence pending cases.

Illegal forced expulsion, aiming for debt collection procedures for compensation costs, the adjustment of social assistance while not necessarily need to have, possession, storage and locking of the housing inventory, including clothing. Defamation and the need to rent a room on our own expense, to a bleeding site and the remaining funds, etc.

Despite the still lawfully awarded Entitled, 30 the municipality since 04. 09 any payments made. But with the health insurance premium of CHF 499.20, the exploitation of the land could have been triggered since the cash for their bonuses, must have certificates of loss.

We still do not have available to register a mortgage or for refusing to help because the registration was not obtained. The presented "involuntary" voluntary ", agreement template is amateurish and legally unusable without serious settlement, now of CHF 224'362 .25 31 12. souped whopping 08 on Fri 320'000 .00, improper coercion instead of signature production.

"coercion is not a good will, even if it is sold as such"

NB: The blog insights and experiences in the limited operations are practiced Social assistance, the community of Zermatt and the SMZ Nikolaital as it should be. Any generalization to social work done in other communities and SMZ centers is not the intent of this blog.

The agreement

Tuesday 9 February 2010, 54th caprice Days

agreement and welfare

Social assistance is a public function. An agreement is created between the public (state and municipal) and private (social assistance recipients), as administrative law or administrative law contract agreement.

release the following "involuntary" voluntary "agreement, the disputed position of the municipality and the resulting situation.

The financial claim, the (added) settlement of the municipality of 06 05. 09 of 31 developed 12. In 2008 by Fr 224'362 .25 to 19 01. 10 to CHF 320'000 .00 to a "respectable, immoral offer".

The various stages of growth, without accounting of each expenditure:

30th 12. 08 display a statutory basis for deposit received social assistance Fri 224'362 .25.

06th 05. 09 Settlement of SMZ Nikolaital to receive from us 07th 01. 09 requires more than CHF 243'155 .70. The sub-total at 30 12. 08 has decreased from the 30th ad 12. 2008 by CHF 2'2406 .55. The demand grew, without invoicing for "not paid rent contribution" of CHF 23'020 .25.

settlement of 06 05. 09: by the State Council are Fri 158'401 .10 of 01 01. 03 to 31 12. 05 recognized social assistance.

From 01 01. 06 are by the State Council are Fri 61'734 .35 31 12. 08 of the settlement of social assistance, compared with the municipality not be recognized. Denial reason: alleged breach of the duty to clarify the municipality. State Council decision of 25 06. 08.

05th 12. 08 Judgement of Cantonal Court

The decision of the District Court clearly states that the disputed support from 01 01. 06 the municipality and the state, but not as we are concerned about the court and not decided.

13th 05. 09 legal request reimbursement from the municipality of Zermatt complaint with the District Court Visp

The first in point Demanded sum of CHF 243'155 .70 plus interest, is the 19th in the agreement 01. 10 included, the total net of interest of the disputed settlement of 06 05. 09, which differs by about CHF 50'000 .00 from the final orders and clarify is .

13th 08. 2009 decision of the municipal council of the municipality of Zermatt on the refund. The complaints procedure has been suspended by the State Council. Total receivables 247'555 .70 Fri. included (damages the community of) two months' rent totaling Fri 4,400 .00 to be settled inadmissible on public assistance.

The following excerpt 4.1. from the disposal across the couple's adoption of the law sought by the action of 13 05. 09, plus two months' rent of CHF 4'400 .00 damages.

With its Decision of 25 11. 2009, the State Council decreed the suspension of the treatment of the complaint, however by the end of the process of reimbursement. The appeal against this decision has, according VVRG Article 51, be suspended.

The municipality is therefore still committed to the economic support. This means that they must remedy according to the present situation created the laws to, especially in the furniture and housing.

27th 01. 10 Email the community of

Sent: Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:32

To: german.taugwalder @ bluewin.ch

Cc: zermatt.ch dany.biner @; Thomas.Bucher @ SMZ-vs.ch; Christoph Bürgin

Subject: Your letter of 23 January 2010

plants: 100 119 Taugwalder.pdf agreement

Good day Mr. Taugwalder

your letter of 23 On 26 January 2010 January 2010 we received.

In our various messages, most recently on 21 January 2010, we have communicated our position concerning your situation clearly. Our offer that we support beyond our legal obligations and without acknowledging any legal liability in your home search, you have not picked up today. In this regard, we have forwarded attached form to sign - this is also the social medical center Nikolaital in Tasch.

We have demonstrated our ability and refer for the other to the District Court and State Council made and our previous emails.

Sincerely Head Administrative Department / Head of Administration Deputy.

The municipality relies more on State Council and District Court decisions, but without calling procedure number or date of the District Court ruling.

19th 01. 09 The "involuntary" voluntary "on the" Lex Darioli "based craft work, entitled" Assistance Housing Search, "the relevant municipal council, the mayor and the head of SMZ Nikolaital confirms certain weaknesses in the parish hall. Advise the hobbyist the pointed attorneys or lawyers pointed the hobbyist? For the attitude of the author, there are only two possibilities: a) non-mastery of the Office or b) intention.

The agreement

An agreement is a binding agreement between two parties, based on the voluntariness of both parties, the agreement is submitted to a dictation, the purpose for which the municipality obtained by coercive situation, in advance would be void. The existence of an agreement depends on additional conditions. They are:

first The parties

lack of agreement on the definition and function of the parties. It is mentioned that SMZ Nikolaital (2) and county (10) and the couple Taugwalder (3) in the text, the SMZ Nikolaital in this Agreement Party. The measures provided for the sole signature of the receiver point to the one-sidedness of the draft.

second The purpose and object of the agreement

the title "Assistance Housing Search (1) shows there are a major problem of current situations, but not related to a registration of a mortgage. It is "a voluntary legal mortgages (4) in the 1st prize in the amount of CHF 320'000 .00 (5)" calls, even though the entry of a legal mortgage in connection with the securing of social assistance Germany is illegal. Found a statutory basis is not voluntary.

It is in (2) and (3) from a support, the speech, which under (10) with "a possible aid" called into question, and (11) of the registration subject is intended to enhance obviously with the delay in the pressure or harassment.

third Interests of the parties, rights and obligations

From the description, the obscure references go, one side's interests Residents of the community out, namely the registration of a legal mortgage which is not allowed.

The amounts in dispute would be subject to the signature of the beneficiaries under the associated services to be accepted. The current reimbursement method of the municipality would be invalid, signed and acknowledged the high-coiffed sum of CHF 320'000 .00 of an "involuntary" voluntary "mortgage. The SMZ should Nikolaital his claims with the changes do not prove correct, and not explain curiosities in accounting.

The present official estimate for the EL of the plots are about 20% less than the required mortgage, an investiture in the 1st Rank for CHF 320'000 .00 (5) is not possible.

The amount of CHF 243'155 .70 (6) and Br 8.105.20 (7) are identical to those in the legal request for reimbursement to decide on the judge, including social assistance, the State Council approved. A signature also means recognition.

covered in (8) listed Fri 18'240 .00 refund rent house Helena not welfare, as these at 30 04. 09 was set and the dispute settlement in the 06th 05. 09 contain exhaustive. There is no agreement on social assistance, in the agreement referred Fri 50'499 .10 (9) contradict existing law.

We had no way to bring our interests. The municipality or the SMZ Nikolaital mentioned only in return those who assisted with the registration of mortgages, probably the most expensive "apartment search" and a possible help, "without setting the 30th they have illegally since 04. 09, refused.

The claims consist of the subscribers, the parent of GES, ARGES and SKOS, awarded binding present in the final orders and judgments of the District Court.

4.The common approach

The usual in an agreement mentioned need for joint action is missing, the agreement is submitted unilateral dictates of the municipality, the discharge of their misconduct, to the detriment of beneficiaries.

are instead forced and voluntary utilization of the emergency, by the previously organized by the community of dubious forced removal of the existing housing, and the withholding of contributions lawfully awarded.

5.Anwendbares law as a legal basis

details of legal principles and the applicable law, on which the agreement supports are missing, on the contrary in (2) attempts to "outside of the legal obligations and without acknowledging any legal obligation" binding, overriding right to exclude and bypass.

The invalidity of an agreement with even the conscious cooperation to achieve success in an unlawful, which gives the impression of an attempt to cheat.

abuse of Switzerland. Penal Code Article 312, an official offense. Ads? Why? The unfortunate "poor Authorities, "but you want to add something. We live black drivers more dangerous than the SBB "black-yellow-up" wrong driver.

"... after the revelers felt: in neri Criminali Lafrini"